RAF Dimerisation and Paradoxical Activation by BRAF Inhibitors
BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib work well against BRAF V600-mutant tumours but can paradoxically switch the MAPK pathway on in cells that have a RAS mutation instead. The explanation lies in how RAF proteins pair up, and it has driven the design of newer inhibitors.
Quick Answer
BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib work well against BRAF V600-mutant tumours but can paradoxically switch the MAPK pathway on in cells that have a RAS mutation instead. The explanation lies in how RAF proteins pair up, and it has driven the design of newer inhibitors.
RAF Works as a Dimer
The RAF kinases (ARAF, BRAF, CRAF) are activated at the membrane by RAS-GTP, which promotes them to pair into dimers. Within a dimer, one protomer allosterically switches on the other.
BRAF V600E is an exception: it is active as a monomer and does not need RAS or dimerisation, which is why it can be targeted cleanly in V600E tumours.
The Paradox
First-generation BRAF inhibitors bind one protomer of a RAF dimer and, through negative cooperativity, actually enhance the activity of the drug-free partner. In a cell with high RAS-GTP, such as a RAS-mutant cell, there are plenty of RAF dimers, so the net effect is increased ERK signalling.
Clinically this manifests as the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas in patients on single-agent BRAF inhibitors, driven by pre-existing RAS mutations in skin cells.
Consequences for Non-V600 and Fusion BRAF
Class 2 BRAF mutants and BRAF fusions signal as dimers, and class 3 mutants depend on CRAF dimers driven by upstream RAS. First-generation inhibitors are poorly effective, or paradoxically activating, against these.
This is a major reason BRAF alterations are stratified into classes, with different or no targeted options for the non-V600 groups.
Newer Inhibitor Designs
Adding a MEK inhibitor mitigates the paradox and reduces secondary skin cancers, which is now standard with BRAF-inhibitor therapy. Paradox-breaker and pan-RAF dimer inhibitors are designed to bind both protomers or to avoid inducing the active conformation.
These aim to extend RAF targeting to class 2 and 3 mutants and BRAF fusions, and several are in clinical development.
Interpretation Notes
A BRAF alteration report should specify the exact change; V600E behaves very differently from non-V600 mutations and fusions with respect to available drugs.
A RAS mutation is a reason not to use a single-agent first-generation BRAF inhibitor, because of paradoxical pathway activation.
Key Takeaways
- ·RAF kinases signal as dimers; BRAF V600E is an exception that works as a monomer.
- ·First-generation BRAF inhibitors transactivate the partner protomer, activating ERK in RAS-mutant cells.
- ·This causes secondary skin tumours and makes the drugs unsuitable for non-V600 BRAF.
- ·MEK-inhibitor combinations and paradox-breaker inhibitors address the problem.
Put these genes in pathway context
Frequently asked questions
What is the key idea in RAF Dimerisation and Paradoxical Activation by BRAF Inhibitors?
BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib work well against BRAF V600-mutant tumours but can paradoxically switch the MAPK pathway on in cells that have a RAS mutation instead. The explanation lies in how RAF proteins pair up, and it has driven the design of newer inhibitors.
What should be kept with the result or mechanism?
First-generation BRAF inhibitors transactivate the partner protomer, activating ERK in RAS-mutant cells. This causes secondary skin tumours and makes the drugs unsuitable for non-V600 BRAF. MEK-inhibitor combinations and paradox-breaker inhibitors address the problem.
References
- 1Paradoxical activation and RAF inhibitor resistance of BRAF protein kinase fusions characterising pediatric astrocytomas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2013. PubMed
- 2Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 Mutations. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015. PubMed
- 3Atypical non-V600 BRAF mutations and response to EGFR inhibition. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020. PubMed
- 4Mechanisms of acquired resistance to targeted cancer therapies. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2016. PubMed
Continue Reading
MEK-ERK Feedback: Why Blocking the MAPK Pathway Is Not Simple
3 min read
BRAF Class 2 vs Class 3 Alterations: A Mechanism Guide
2 min read
BRAF V600E vs Non-V600 Alterations: Why Classification Matters
2 min read
MAPK Pathway Resistance: A Framework for Reading Resistance Reports
2 min read
How BRAF and MEK Inhibitors Work — and Why They Are Combined
3 min read
Companion Diagnostics: Tests Tied to Specific Treatments
3 min read
Choose your next research step
Move from this explanation into a gene profile, a pathway map, or the next evidence update.
BRAF has 175+ trials currently recruiting on ClinicalTrials.gov. The GeneAnalyses digest summarises the new and changed ones each day.