Translesion Synthesis: Damage Tolerance and Mutagenesis
Translesion synthesis is a damage-tolerance mechanism rather than a repair pathway. When the replication fork meets a lesion that has not been removed, specialised low-fidelity polymerases are swapped in to copy directly across the damage, allowing replication to finish at the cost of an increased chance of introducing a mutation.
Quick Answer
Translesion synthesis is a damage-tolerance mechanism rather than a repair pathway. When the replication fork meets a lesion that has not been removed, specialised low-fidelity polymerases are swapped in to copy directly across the damage, allowing replication to finish at the cost of an increased chance of introducing a mutation.
Part of a topic cluster
DNA Repair and Genomic Instability
Open the complete 15-article guideSwapping the Polymerase
The replicative polymerases have tight active sites that stall at damaged bases. Translesion polymerases such as Pol eta, Pol iota, Pol kappa and REV1, together with the Pol zeta extender, have more open active sites that can accommodate a distorted template.
A key trigger is monoubiquitination of the sliding clamp PCNA at stalled forks, which increases the affinity of translesion polymerases for the primer terminus. After bypass, the high-fidelity polymerase is restored.
Accuracy Depends on the Lesion
Pol eta copies past ultraviolet cyclobutane dimers relatively accurately, which is why its loss causes a variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum with UV sensitivity despite intact excision repair.
For many other lesions the bypass polymerases insert an incorrect base, so translesion synthesis is a major source of point mutations after genotoxic exposure. Post-replicative gaps left opposite lesions can also be filled later by these polymerases.
Relevance to Treatment Resistance
Because translesion synthesis lets cells survive DNA damage from chemotherapy and continue dividing, high pathway activity has been associated in laboratory models with tolerance of platinum and other agents, and with the accelerated mutation accrual seen in drug-tolerant persister cells.
This is preclinical rationale for targeting the pathway, not an established clinical strategy, and no translesion-synthesis inhibitor is a standard treatment.
Reading It on a Tumour Report
Translesion synthesis is not something a clinical report measures or acts on. Its main interpretive relevance is as one explanation for the accelerated, often APOBEC-flavoured mutation accrual seen in drug-tolerant persister cells and in tumours that relapse after a long targeted-therapy response.
Investigational inhibitors of REV1 or Pol zeta aim to blunt chemotherapy-induced mutagenesis and resistance and are in early trials. Until those mature, the pathway is best understood as background biology that shapes how resistance evolves rather than as something to test for.
Key Takeaways
- ·Translesion synthesis tolerates DNA damage by replicating across it with specialised polymerases.
- ·The process is often error-prone and contributes to mutagenesis after genotoxic exposure.
- ·Its role in surviving chemotherapy damage makes it a research target for resistance, not yet a clinical one.
Put these genes in pathway context
Frequently asked questions
Is translesion synthesis a repair pathway?
No. It is a damage-tolerance mechanism: specialised low-fidelity polymerases copy directly across an unrepaired lesion so replication can finish, at the cost of a higher chance of introducing a mutation.
Why does losing Pol eta cause a form of xeroderma pigmentosum?
Pol eta accurately bypasses ultraviolet dimers. Without it, other, less accurate polymerases take over that job, so cells stay ultraviolet-sensitive even though nucleotide excision repair is intact — the XP-variant phenotype.
Can translesion synthesis be targeted therapeutically?
Only in research. High pathway activity helps cells tolerate chemotherapy damage in laboratory models, which is preclinical rationale for inhibitors, but none is an established treatment.
References
- 1Filling gaps in translesion DNA synthesis in human cells. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen, 2018. PubMed
- 2Base excision repair, the redox environment and therapeutic implications. Curr Mol Pharmacol, 2012. PubMed
- 3Therapy-induced APOBEC3A drives evolution of persistent cancer cells. Nature, 2023. PubMed
Continue Reading
Base Excision Repair: Small Lesions, Large Consequences
3 min read
Nucleotide Excision Repair, Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Platinum Response
3 min read
APOBEC Mutagenesis: An Internal Source of Cancer Mutations
3 min read
MAPK Pathway Resistance: A Framework for Reading Resistance Reports
2 min read
ATM Kinase and the DNA Damage Response
4 min read
ATM vs ATR: Two DNA-Damage Response Kinases
2 min read
Choose your next research step
Move from this explanation into a gene profile, a pathway map, or the next evidence update.
ATM has 75+ trials currently recruiting on ClinicalTrials.gov. The GeneAnalyses digest summarises the new and changed ones each day.